Learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has a long learning curve. It can be a technically challenging procedure and initially presents an unfamiliar view of inguinal anatomy. The aim of this review was to evaluate published literature relating to the learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and identify the number of cases required for proficiency. The secondary aim was to compare outcomes between surgeons before and after this learning curve threshold had been attained. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in databases of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to identify studies that evaluated the learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A meta-regression analysis was undertaken to identify the number of cases to achieve surgical proficiency, and a meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes between cases that were undertaken during a surgeon's learning phase and experienced phase of the curve. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included in this review, with 19 studies included in the meta-regression analysis, and 11 studies included in the meta-analysis. Mixed-effects Poisson regression demonstrated that there was a non-linear trend in the number of cases required to achieve surgical proficiency, with a 2.7% year-on-year decrease. The predicted number of cases to achieve surgical proficiency in 2020 was 32.5 (p < 0.01). The meta-analysis determined that surgeons in their learning phase may experience a higher rate of conversions to open (OR 4.43, 95% CI 1.65, 11.88), postoperative complications (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.07, 2.42), and recurrences (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.40, 4.30). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has a well-defined learning curve. While learning surgeons demonstrated reasonable outcomes, supervision during this period may be appropriate given the increased risk of conversion to open surgery. These data may benefit learning surgeons in the skill development of minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs.

Hospital in the home-based management of acute diverticulitis: a safe and effective alternative to inpatient care.

BACKGROUND: The traditional approach to management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis involves admission to hospital, antibiotic therapy, gut rest and monitoring for the development of complications. Despite evidence to suggest this can safely be performed in an outpatient setting, inpatient care remains standard practice in Australia potentially due to a variety of factors (van Dijk et al. 2018; Cirocchi et al. 2019). Hospital in the home (HIH) allows patients requiring complex care including intravenous antibiotics, intravenous fluids and complex pain relief to be managed at home. This study examined the safety and efficacy of HIH-based care for acute diverticulitis over a 16-year period. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective review of cases of acute diverticulitis managed under our HIH service from the period of 1st of January 2004 to 20th of October 2020 was completed. Baseline descriptive data relating to age, co-morbidities and severity of diverticulitis was collected. Details of medical treatment provided and subsequent complications were also collected. RESULTS: During the study period, 23 patients with acute diverticulitis were treated under the HIH unit. Among the study population, the median age was 60 (interquartile range 15) with a slight female predominance (n = 13, 56.5%). This represented the first presentation in 60.9% of patients. Average length of stay was 3.6 days (SD = 1.0) with no acute complications recorded in the study period. Two patients (8.7%) had further episodes of acute diverticulitis within 60 days. CONCLUSION: In this study, the lack of complications demonstrated indicates that HIH-based management of acute diverticulitis may be a viable and safe alternative to inpatient care.

Long-Term Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Weight Loss at 10 or More Years for All Bariatric Procedures and a Single-Centre Review of 20-Year Outcomes After Adjustable Gastric Banding.

INTRODUCTION: Durability is a key requirement for the broad acceptance of bariatric surgery. We report on durability at and beyond 10 years with a systematic review and meta-analysis of all reports providing data at 10 or more years and a single-centre study of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) with 20 years of follow-up. METHODS: Systematic review with meta-analysis was performed on all eligble reports containing 10 or more years of follow-up data on weight loss after bariatric surgery. In addition, a prospective cohort study of LAGB patients measuring weight loss and reoperation at up to 20 years is presented. RESULTS: Systematic review identified 57 datasets of which 33 were eligible for meta-analysis. Weighted means of the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) were calculated for all papers included in the systematic review. Eighteen reports of gastric bypass showed a weighted mean of 56.7%EWL, 17 reports of LAGB showed 45.9%EWL, 9 reports of biliopancreatic bypass +/- duodenal switch showed 74.1%EWL and 2 reports of sleeve gastrectomy showed 58.3%EWL. Meta-analyses of eligible studies demonstrated comparable results. Reoperations were common in all groups. At a single centre, 8378 LAGB patients were followed for up to 20 years with an overall follow-up rate of 54%. No surgical deaths occurred. Weight loss at 20 years (N = 35) was 30.1 kg, 48.9%EWL and 22.2% total weight loss (%TWL). Reoperation rate was initially high but reduced markedly with improved band and surgical and aftercare techniques. CONCLUSION: All current procedures are associated with substantial and durable weight loss. More long-term data are needed for one-anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Reoperation is likely to remain common across all procedures.

The Physiology and Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients with Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) on esophageal acid exposure and reflux is poorly understood. Optimal technique and normative values for acid exposure have not been established in this group. METHODS: High-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring were performed in three groups: asymptomatic LAGB, symptomatic LAGB, and pre-operative reflux patients. This technique utilized intraluminal pressure signatures during HRM to guide accurate pH sensor placement. RESULTS: The LAGB groups were well matched: age 48 vs 51 years (p = 0.249), weight loss 27.3 vs 26.7 kg (p = 0.911). The symptomatic group had a larger gastric pouch (5.2 vs 3.3 cm, p = 0.012), with higher esophageal acid exposure (10.8 vs 0.9%, p < 0.001). Two acidification patterns were observed: irritant and volume acidification, associated with substantial supine acidification. Symptomatic LAGB had altered esophageal motility, with poorer lower esophageal sphincter basal tone (8.0 vs 17.7 mmHg, p = 0.022) and impaired contractility of the lower esophageal segment (90 vs 40%, p = 0.009). Compared to pre-operative reflux patients, symptomatic LAGB patients demonstrated higher total and supine esophageal acid exposure (10.8 vs 7.0%, p = 0.010; 14.9 vs 5.1%, p < 0.001), less symptoms (2 vs 6, p = 0.001) and lower symptom index (0.7 vs 0.9, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory pH monitoring is an effective technique if the pH sensor is positioned appropriately using HRM. The correctly positioned LAGB appears associated with low esophageal acidification. In contrast, patients with symptoms or pouch dilatation can have markedly elevated esophageal acidification, particularly when supine. This is a different pattern compared to pre-operative patients and importantly can be disproportionate to symptoms.

Update in achalasia: what the surgeon needs to know.

Achalasia is a motility disorder encountered by surgeons during the investigation and treatment of dysphagia. Recent advances in manometry technology, a widely accepted new classification system and a new treatment rapidly gaining international acceptance, have changed the working knowledge required to successfully manage patients with achalasia. We review the Chicago classification subtypes of achalasia with type II achalasia being a predictor of success and type III achalasia a predictor of treatment failure. We review per-oral endoscopic myotomy as an emerging treatment option and its potential for improving the treatment of type III achalasia.

Predictors of outcome after surgery for gastric cancer in a Western cohort.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is a common cause of cancer mortality. There are well-documented prognostic factors for GC but these have not been rigorously examined in an Australian context. This study examines the clinical, surgical and histopathological variables associated with survival in a GC cohort from a predominantly Caucasian-based population. METHODS: A multi-centre cohort of patients undergoing curative resection for GC enrolled in an ongoing tissue bank study from 1999 to 2009 was retrospectively analysed. Prospectively collected demographic, surgical and pathological variables were available for this cohort. The primary endpoints investigated were cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival using multivariate Cox proportional hazard modelling. RESULTS: Five-year cancer-specific survival was 45.9%, 5-year relapse-free survival was 44.7% and 30-day mortality was 2.2%. Variables showing significance on multivariate analysis for cancer-specific and relapse-free survival were AJCC stage, Lauren classification and age at surgery. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the prognostic variables for a predominantly Caucasian GC population are congruent with published prognostic features. These findings emphasize the importance of the pathological review in allocating prognosis in GC.

Pathophysiology of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: analysis and classification using high-resolution video manometry and a stress barium protocol.

BACKGROUND: Symmetrical pouch dilatation has become the most common problem following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Although, in a significant number of symptomatic patients, no explanation for the underlying problem is identified with a contrast swallow. There is a need for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of LAGBs and more sensitive diagnostic tests. METHODS: LAGB patients with adverse symptoms or poor weight loss (symptomatic patients), in whom a contrast swallow had not shown an abnormality, underwent high-resolution video manometry. This incorporated a semi-solid, stress barium, swallow protocol. Outcomes were categorized based on anatomical appearance, transit through the LAGB, and esophageal motility. Cohorts of successful (>50% excess weight loss with no adverse symptoms) and pre-operative patients were used as controls. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three symptomatic patients participated along with 30 successful and 56 pre-operative patients. Five pathophysiological patterns were defined: transhiatal enlargement (n = 40), sub-diaphragmatic enlargement (n = 39), no abnormality (n = 30), aperistaltic esophagus (n = 7), and intermittent gastric prolapse (n = 3). Esophageal motility disorders were more common in symptomatic and pre-operative patients than in successful patients (p = 0.01). Differences between successful and symptomatic patients were identified in terms of the length of the high-pressure zone above the LAGB (p < 0.005), peristaltic velocity (p < 0.005), frequency of previous surgery(p = 0.01), and lower esophageal sphincter tone (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Video manometry identified abnormalities in three quarters of symptomatic patients where conventional contrast swallow had not been diagnostic. Five primary patterns of pathophysiology were defined. These were used to develop a seven category, clinical, classification system based on the anatomical appearance at stress barium. This system stratifies the spectrum of symmetrical pouch dilatation and can be used to logically guide treatment.